Is it me, or is there something very wrong with Recruitment Agencies?

I'm old, now, but I remember a time when if you contacted an agency about a job you found in some paper publication, you'd get a reply. If not positive at least a letter (paper) telling you that your application was not successful. If an agency called you (on a land line phone - no mobiles back then) they'd get some details from you and if they felt you met the criteria, they'd submit you and actually would call, or write (landline, or paper) telling you the out come. Positive or negative.

Today we have computerization, e-mail, the Internet, fax (still), and MOBILE PHONES!

But when you respond to an ad posted on the Internet your lucky if you'd get an automated response! The majority of recruitment agencies (from my estimates, based on my experience in the last several years) don't bother to respond, reply or anything, when sending off your cv in response to a job advert you feel you would like to be considered for.

Even when they do eventually contact you, if ever, you usually don't hear back! For an example, I've had my cv sent to four companies through this one agency. Two, contract jobs, resulted in interviews. One other for a contract job, and another for a permanent job. This was over 5 weeks ago and so far I've heard nothing on any of these jobs from the agents. Not even from the contract jobs I interviewed for over 4 weeks ago!!!

I wrote and called only to be told that they have not heard anything, yet. That was over two weeks ago and I've given up ever since.

Excuses given when I asked why they don't respond? To many responses to their posting. OK, then what about those times when my cv has been submitted to an employer? Why have I not received even the typical 'not successful on this occasion...'?' Nothing!

I received several e-mails from this one agent alerting me about jobs over the last several months. In two occasions I replied expressing my interest and why I felt I fit the job requirements. I heard nothing from this person. I received another alert from this person about a week ago and rather than just dump the e-mail I replied asking to have my name removed from their database and expressing the reason why. Just yesterday I received another alert, but this time I replied with an angry message telling the agent to remove my name from their database. Boy, did I get a reply this time, and the agent was asking why? I can only guess that she never ever bothered to read any of my previous reply e-mails.

In my humble opinion today's recruitment agencies are utterly CRAP! Unfortunately they're the only major avenue one has in getting jobs, since most employers rarely, if ever, advertise jobs through their HR departments. And, when you're looking for a contract job, well, you know.

It seems to me that things have not really improved with these recruitment agencies with the introduction of our fancy high tech gagets and devices. If fact I'm apt to believe they've gotten worse! For that matter it seems to me, as well, that these agencies hire poeple with no experience in the industries they are to recruit for (I get e-mails for RF, or Hardware engineers. I even get e-mails for Delphi programmers - I'm a mechanical design engineer!!! Can't they read? Oh, Delphi is the name of one of the companies I worked for. So much for using high tech to make ones job easier, heh?)

Actually, computers, and their fancy software, has made many people just plain lazy.

I think I can write a book on this subject, with lots, and lots of examples.

What do you think? Got any interesting experiences?

Miguel

 

Similar experience here, but I have to say that there are good agencies and bad agencies - I found that it helps if you can get some sort of (professional) relationship going with an agent.

Through hundreds of applications, over the last few years, I have come to expect that I probably won't get a response, but given the quantity of potential applicants to any particular job advertised on Jobsite or Monster (UK job boards), I wouldn't relish the task of sending out 300 rejection e-mails.

One specific example did get my goat however - was approached by an agency for a job in Central London, which I jumped at the chance for - I went to their office and met the recruitment agent, and they provided very good communication -checking up 24 hours in advance of the interview to make sure I was all set. I got through that interview and was offered a 2nd round which involved carrying out a design project for the company. Which I dutifully did and spent an awful lot of time and sleepless nights on. The interview was postponed 3 times for various reasons over Christmas, until the big day came - again, the pre interview phone call came with a little pep talk. I did the interview, it seemed to go well, and then...... .... ..... Silence...

E-mails went unanswered, phone calls not returned. To this day, I still have not been formally rejected for the job. But being April, I'll take it as a 'No'.

How many people get through to a final round interview? 5? 6? Surely it’s not going to take forever to say "sorry - not this time". Just found it a bit rude to be honest.

Incidentally - I was under the impression that if you get interviewed, the company has to find a reason to not hire you - even if it's just "he wasn't as good as her", and that this information should be passed on to the candidate?

.... More than I was planning to write, but better out than in!!

 

We have the same problem here in the states. I can't tell if it's the influx of young, inexperienced recruiters or if the customer service paradigm that has existed for years has all but vanished. The same story applies for the corprate Human Resources departments. I can appreciate that their desks become inundated with the vast amounts of reumes/cv's sent in for each job opening, but it isn't really that much work to send out bulk emails to the non-qualifiers. I don't understand why it has suddenly become acceptable to choose not to respond at all. It's as if we aren't worthy of a response. Heck, at this point, I would just like to know if my resume actually made it into their inbox. Is that really too much to ask????

 

If I may chime in. I found that although technology can be our friend, its can be a hindrance. Years back just getting a resume to a company was either by mail or by fax, followed up by a mailing. This coupled with at times a better economy, paired down the qty of resumes that went across HR's desk.

Now you have a poor economy where resumes are flying in at the speed of light, (speed of sound was soo last menenium) that the HR department is simply overwhelmed. And adding another resource to handle that simply isnt on the books in most cases.

When looking for work, and who isnt these days, I have a standard routine. Call first, speak to someone in HR, get names and make an impression. Send the resume & cover letter (email), request confirmation. Follow up with snail mail copies, on quality stock. Follow up with a phone call a week later, again make an impression. Dont give up. Dont email in place of a voice call, anyone can make themselves sound great in an email. Confidence can only be transmitted through your voice. This WILL set you apart from the other candidates.

What if the employer says no calls, email preferred!!!! OMG RUN! Seriously... run, run to the company, request to speak with HR briefly, just an introduction and to hand your resume and cover letter to them personally. This gives me a better perspective on the front line faces of the company I want to work for.

I will follow up with dead heads 3-6 and 9 months on companies that interest me. If for nothing just to keep the contact list fresh.

 

Can I also add that all the recruiters reading this are obviously not the bad ones that we've been whingeing about, and are in fact jolly nice and highly professional people. Pleaseandthankyou! :roll:

 

I will also add that I have worked with 2 very good recruiters in the past and plan to continue my relationship with them as long as possible. These gentlemen put customer service at a premium, put in the effort to understand your capabilities, and have a firm grasp of what type of company/environment your are seeking. It may just be that these guys are a bit older and have a wealth of experience, or perhaps it is because they are cut from a different cloth. I don't know the answer, but I do know that good ones aren't easy to find so keep those relationships healthy.

 

What about a tried and tested recruiters thread!?

 

Just thought I should add....
After many years of frustration and pointless interviews with agents I gave up on them and did what mvalenti does - call the companies on spec. Got several interviews this way (one or two with big internationals!). I would think with the advent of LinkedIn etc that this process becomes easier - maybe?

Look at it this way - it saves you the hassle and the company the expense of dealing with agents. Win-win I think. Mind you I do understand that ID is a different market to Mech Eng.

PS Got two of my jobs through magazine ads - ie not an agent, more luck really ...
PPS Now, as an employer I do not use an agent.